Category Archives: Media landscape

Tomi Lahren ‘comes out’ as pro-choice

27943413866_eed8600cb5_b.jpg

Tomi Lahren, center, speaks at the 2016 Politicon in Pasadena, California. / Photo (cc) 2016 Gage Skidmore

The abortion rights movement just earned its most surprising supporter—Tomi Lahren.

Lahren is the 24-year-old host of the show “Tomi” on the conservative website TheBlaze. She is infamous for her fast-talking rants against feminism and Black Lives Matter, and she has come to serve as a symbol of the conservative millennial generation. She often yells about her right to speak her mind, regardless of whether her opinions piss people off.

Usually, however, she’s just angering liberals. Last week, she pissed off the the wrong people—the conservatives who watch her show—and her show was suspended for a week as a result.

Here’s what happened: During an appearance on The View on Friday, Lahren shocked audience members by “coming out” as pro-choice.

“I’m pro-choice and here’s why…As someone that loves the Constitution, I am someone that is for limited government,” Lahren said on The View. “And so I can’t sit here and be a hypocrite and say I’m for limited government but I think that the government should decide what women do with their bodies…So stay out of my guns, and you can stay out of my body as well.”

Over the course of the past week, the once darling conservative sweetheart has been berated by the same Grand Old Party that claims to be staunch defenders of free speech. Apparently, that freedom only extends to guys like Milo Yiannopoulos, who spread hateful words about women and minorities, and not Lahren, who holds a view that differs from the conservative norm.

Funny enough, this might be the one area in which Lahren and I agree. Conservatives are hypocrites for advocating for a small government, while imposing strict regulations on women’s bodies. And although I’m often not a fan of what Lahren has to say, I believe her being punished for publicly stating her position on abortion is ludicrous. Even as a conservative webshow host, Lahren should be able to stand on the side of women’s rights and women’s health without fear of retribution.

Advertisements

Final project proposal: What reproductive justice means to women of color

33308938301_66cc74576f_o.jpg

A spray painted fist imposed on a female symbol adorns  a sidewalk in Paris, France. / Photo courtesy (cc) 2017 Dean Bocquet

The very phrase “reproductive justice” was coined by a group of black women in 1994 after they attended the International Conference on Population and Development in Cairo, Egypt—where world representatives agreed that the right to plan one’s family was critical to global development.

Following this conference, the group of black women met in Chicago to discuss how the women’s right’s movement was being led by white middle- and upper-class feminists who were often blind to the challenges faced by women of color in the reproductive rights movement.

“I’d had a number of conversations with black women’s organizations who were totally convinced that [abortion] was a white women’s issue,” Loretta Ross, co-founder of SisterSong Women of Color Reproductive Justice Collective, said of the 1980s in a MAKERS video.

For my final project, I would like my article and video project to analyze the different ways in which the fight to access reproductive services is more challenging for women of color than it is for white women. I would interview experts in Boston such as professors, lawyers or nonprofit workers who study the hurdles that women of color must leap over to access abortion. I would like to dive into this topic because, more than two decades after the creation of the “reproductive justice” movement by black women, the pro-abortion side often fails to highlight the unique perspectives of black women in the movement.

I reached out to Boston University law professor Khiara M. Bridges, who studies the intersection of race, class and reproductive justice, as well as Northeastern’s women’s, gender and sexuality studies professor Moya Bailey, who studies race and feminism with an emphasis on how marginalized groups use digital media for social justice purposes.

For my photo story, I would like to use photographs from “No Turning Back,” a conference hosted by Northeastern’s women’s, gender and sexuality studies program on Friday that addressed the history of the abortion movement and its legal impediments.

Just from my preliminary research, I have find some shocking statistics and information about the disparities faced by women of color in regards to reproductive health. According to a 2008 study by the Guttmacher Institute, the abortion rate in the United States is five times higher for black women than for white women. This higher rate is largely credited to black women’s higher rates of unintended pregnancies due to limited reproductive health education and services. Because of this, black women are often targets of hatred by the anti-abortion side, who charge that they are committing genocide against their own race.

According to a study by Bridges, black women are also much more likely to die in childbirth than white women—no matter what their class is. And black motherhood has also been historically criminalized, culminating in the War on Drugs and the “crack babies” phenomenon in the 1980s, in which black female drug addicts were disproportionately locked up for crimes like child abuse and even murder for birthing alleged crack-addicted babies. Only years later would we learn that crack cocaine did not have long term effects on infants, and that the shaking that was commonly shown by “crack babies” was likely a result of the babies being born prematurely to mothers who maintained harsh lifestyles.

The black mother has so often been demonized that black feminists argue that reproductive justice includes the right to have children in addition to the right to not have children.

“It’s about abortion but it’s not just about abortion,” Ross said. “Because we are women of color that come from communities always subjected to population control schemes, we fight equally hard for the right to have our children.”

Clearly, access to reproductive health is not the same for black women as it is for white women. I would like to explore this topic further with my article and video.

Feministing offers diverse perspectives from young feminists

Feministing.com is an online community that was founded in 2004 by sisters Jessica and Vanessa Valenti.

A site that has proved to be invaluable as I blog about the reproductive justice movement in Trump’s America is Feministing.com. Feministing describes itself as “an online community run by and for young feminists.” The blog offers feminist analyses of pop culture, social justice and politics, among other things.

I love Feministing mainly becomes it offers a diverse array of perspectives on important current events. The site employs columnists of different races, genders, sexual orientations and class backgrounds—which is especially helpful for issues that disproportionately affect those specific subgroups.

It also offers the “Daily Feminist Cheatsheet,” which is great if you’re looking for a place to quickly skim the day’s most important headlines and find convenient links to those stories on other accredited news sources. While I do like the “Daily Feminist Cheatsheet,” I wish the descriptions of the day’s stories had a bit more substantial information rather than just a sentence.  It would be helpful if it was more similar to the daily newsletters that major news sites publish so that the reader is not required to read each individual article to get the full story (or at least the important facts in it).

Other than that, I am not a huge fan of the capitalized bolded headlines for the articles, but I understand the point that it’s trying to make. In a society where women’s voices are so systematically silenced, this blog seeks to scream women’s opinions in your face and make sure the feminist perspective is heard.

Promoting engaging conversations among its audience is perhaps what Feministing does best. The site has a “Community” tab that is open to submissions from anyone. However, the site is clear about its submission guidelines. “Anti-feminist posts will not be published, and we believe that racism, classism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia and hate speech constitute anti-feminism and have no place on the site,” the “Community” section guidelines read.

In an attempt to cut down on harassment in the comments section (which feminist sites are especially vulnerable to), Feministing using Disquis—a worldwide blog comment hosting service that prompts users to first sign in with their Facebook, Twitter, Google+ or Disquis account. Although not a perfect system, this service aims to take away the anonymity that emboldens so many misogynist trolls to publish their hateful comments. The Feministing team is also clear that it reserves the right not to publish any posts or comments as it sees fit.

Feministing was founded in 2004 by sisters Jessica and Vanessa Valenti. The blog was inspired by Jessica Valenti, who worked at a women’s organization at the time, perceiving a lack of young women voices in the feminist movement. Jessica Valenti would later skyrocket to feminist fame in 2007, when she published her book “Full Frontal Feminism.” Most recently, she published a memoir in 2016 entitled “Sex Object,” which provides an honest and blunt portrayal of the not-so-good things that coming of age as a woman in America brings. Jessica Valenti is also a columnist at The Guardian US, which is another source I frequently turn to for blogging inspiration about relevant problems facing the reproductive justice movement.

After 10 years, the Valenti sisters have stepped down from running the day-to-day operations of Feminsting, leaving it to a trio of executive directors—Lori Adelman, Maya Dusenbery and Jos Truitt. The site is financially supported by the Center for Sex & Culture, a cultural center in San Francisco that aims to provide “non-judgmental, sex-positive sexuality education,” according to its mission statement on SanFrancisco.com.

According to SimilarWeb, Feministing.com receives about 240,000 visits per month. The average visit duration is not very long, at just 37 seconds, and users visit about 1.46 pages per visit. Just a little more than half of the website’s traffic is from the United States, and the traffic was higher in the couple months leading up to the 2016 presidential election, seeming to steadily decline since. Social media counts for an incredibly small amount of it’s traffic, at just around 6 percent, while direct searches takes the cake for highest source of traffic at 60.6 percent.

Regardless of its traffic, there is a reason why Feministing.com has been called “the largest online feminist community in the world.” It provides a platform for the sharp, intelligent, well-informed opinions that today’s young women in the feminist movement care about, while also supplying a communal outlet for engagement about those issues.

10 Twitters to follow for reproductive justice

If you’re interested in following the evolution of access to abortion and birth control under the Trump administration, then there are a lot of Twitters you’ll definitely want to keep an eye on. Here are my top 10 (in no particular order), from both sides of the aisle:

Screen Shot 2017-01-26 at 6.48.35 PM.png

1. Planned Parenthood Action Fund (@PPact

Planned Parenthood is a national health clinic that provides sex education, birth control, abortions, tests and treatments for sexually-transmitted diseases, Pap tests and breast exams for millions of women and men each year. Unless you’ve been living under a rock, you know that Planned Parenthood has become the poster child for Republican congresspeople’s anger.

Republicans have been trying to defund the clinic at least at the state level since the 1970s, but the campaign really became a national hot-button issue in the past couple years. The Planned Parenthood Action Fund is the branch that deals with education and advocacy for women’s health and rights.

What better place to get updates on the reproductive justice movement than the institution at the center of all the controversy?

Screen Shot 2017-01-26 at 6.51.11 PM.png

2. Susan B. Anthony List (@SBAList

The Susan B. Anthony List is one of the most well-known organizations that lobbies for pro-life bills in Congress and works to elect pro-life candidates. According to their website, the goal of the organization is to  “protect unborn children and their mothers from abortion.” They can pretty much be thought of as the polar opposite to Planned Parenthood.

As for whether Susan B. Anthony, the 1850s women’s rights icon, was actually pro-life or pro-choice has been heavily debated by American historians and journalists.

Screen Shot 2017-01-26 at 6.55.12 PM.png

3. Jessica Valenti (@JessicaValenti)

Jessica Valenti is a Brooklyn-based Guardian US columnist and the author of four feminist books, most recently her memoir “Sex Object.” Valenti writes with humor, clarity and wit about feminism, reproductive rights and other pressing women’s rights issues. She also faces a lot of harassment for her viewpoints, especially on Twitter. The harassment has gotten so bad that she briefly quit Twitter in July 2016 after receiving rape and death threats targeting her 5-year-old daughter.

Valenti is important to follow in order to get the voice and perspective of a modern-day feminist journalist.

Screen Shot 2017-01-26 at 7.07.03 PM.png

4. Pro-Life Action League (@ProLifeAction)

The Pro-Life Action League is a Chicago-based grassroots organization that recruits and trains people to protest against abortion. They organize nationwide rallies to protest celebrations of Roe v. Wade—the landmark 1973 Supreme Court case that federally legalized abortion—and to advocate defunding Planned Parenthood. The league offers an important look into the recruiting styles and strategies of pro-life activists.

Screen Shot 2017-01-26 at 7.02.35 PM.png

5. Cecile Richards (@CecileRichards)

Cecile Richards is the President of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America and the Planned Parenthood Action Fund. She skyrocketed to feminist icon fame after she remained calm while being grilled by Congress in September 2015 about a series of videos by the anti-abortion group Center for Medical Progress that purported to show that Planned Parenthood made money from the sale of fetal tissue. This led to a popular rally cry for pro-lifers—that Planned Parenthood “sells baby parts.” Richards vehemently denied the allegations, saying the videos were deceptively edited and was “just the most recent in a long line of discredited attacks.”

Richards’ Twitter is a great source to find not only information on Planned Parenthood, but also on recent laws passed by Congress concerning women’s health and reproductive rights.

Screen Shot 2017-01-26 at 7.09.50 PM.png

6. Judie Brown (@Judie_Brown)

Judie Brown is president of the American Life League (ALL), which is the “largest grassroots Catholic pro-life education organization in the United States,” according to its website. ALL is as far right as it gets, believing that abortion can never be “medically necessary or morally permitted.

Brown is an important source for new developments in pro-life activism and laws.

Screen Shot 2017-01-26 at 11.00.18 PM.png

7. Christine Grimaldi (@chgrimaldi)

Christine Grimaldi is a federal policy reporter for Rewire News, a pro-choice website focused on issues including abortion, contraception, LGBTQ rights and sexual health. Grimaldi, who is based in Washington D.C., writers about reproductive health and justice issues in Congress, making her an invaluable source for this blog.

Screen Shot 2017-01-26 at 11.02.36 PM.png

8. DC Abortion Fund (@DCAbortionFund)

The DC Abortion Fund (DCAF) is the only nonprofit in Washington DC that provides grants to low-income pregnant women so they can afford abortions. According to their website, the group’s vision is to “make reproductive choice a reality.” Since the organization’s very existence is tied to having abortion access, one can understand why they’d be particularly vocal on the issue—and why they’d be a good Twitter to follow.

Screen Shot 2017-01-26 at 11.10.01 PM.png

9. ProLife Youth (@ProLifeYouth)

ProLife Youth is a organization looking to portray pro-life youth in the media. They believe that life begins at conception and that it is wrong to take away life “no matter the reason or situation,” according to the organization’s website. This organization gives voice to a relatively unheard audience in the abortion movement—pro-life youth—thus making it an important follow.

Screen Shot 2017-01-26 at 11.11.09 PM.png

10. Alexa Garcia-Ditta (@agarciaditta)

Last but not least, we have Alexa Garcia-Ditta, a former Texas Observer reporter who now works for NARAL Pro-Choice Texas. Texas has been at the center for heated debates concerning abortion access.

In 2013, the Texas state legislature passed a series of laws—known as TRAP laws or Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers—that imposed heavy restrictions on abortion clinics and caused all except for a handful of clinics to close temporarily in the state. Former State Senator Wendy Davis rose to national prominence when she famously filibustered the state senate for 13 hours in an unsuccessful attempt to block the bill from passing. In June 2016, the Supreme Court struck down the TRAP laws as an unconstitutional “undue burden” on a woman’s right to abortion. Still, the issue is far from being resolved in the state.

As someone who both lives in Texas and works for an abortion rights organization, Garcia-Ditta will be a crucial perspective to gain insight from.

The future of news

5392906091_7b611d512b_o.jpg

Photo courtesy (cc) 2011 Nghiem Long

With the advent of the Internet and personal computers, the way that people consume news has changed dramatically over the past few decades. Many people, even before these technologies were conceived, understood that print journalism would not be a permanent medium and looked ahead to predict how the industry would adapt in the future.

A 1981 newscast from San Francisco’s KRON covered revolutionary efforts by The San Francisco Examiner and The San Francisco Chronicle to program the day’s newspaper articles and transmit them to personal home computers. Through a modern lens, the broadcast is funny because the technology seems archaic. However, if you take a step back, it’s pretty remarkable to realize that the editors at the San Francisco papers were essentially predicting the Internet and online journalism.

Perhaps most prophetically of all, David Cole of The Examiner said of the new technology, “We’re not in it to make money.” In retrospect, this is a painfully ironic statement about where the industry was headed, as the Internet made it impossible for journalism to continue as a profitable business.

1994 broadcast from The Knight-Ridder in Boulder, Colorado, debuted another new technology—the tablet newspaper. Roger Fidler, the director of the paper’s media lab, understood that media was undergoing a dramatic transformation and that there needed to be “an alternative to ink on paper.”

At its heart, the tablet newspaper that Knight-Ridder created was a remarkably early version of the iPad and iPhone. The biggest thing the company got wrong, however, was that journalism would still be able to profit through advertising—especially interactive ads. This proved to be woefully inaccurate, as nobody wants to interact with ads. On the contrary, the Internet has given advertisers ways to sell their products without going through newspapers.

Finally, the EPIC 2015 video from the Museum of Media History offers a rather bleak view of the future of journalism (that, thankfully, has not fully come to fruition). However, a lot of it was correct—notably that Google develops the “Google Grid” to combine all of its services, which is essentially Google drive, that Amazon tracks buying patterns and customizes advertisements from it, and that The New York Times switches to a paid subscription service. Google and Amazon, thankfully, have not combined yet to make Googlezon and The New York Times has not sued Google and lost in the Supreme Court.

While it seems that many individuals were able to predict new technologies and mediums for journalism, none of them could figure out one all important question: how would journalism profit in the modern era?